BREAKTHROUGH
Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth
Printer Friendly Version
On October 28th of
last year, the United Methodist clergy of the North Carolina
Conference gathered at St. Mark’s Church in Raleigh. We assembled in
the sanctuary for a Bishop’s Day Apart, which is a time for worship
and teaching.
As with most such
gatherings, this Day Apart began with worship. Then Bishop Marion M.
Edwards mounted the pulpit. For the next hour or so, he did something
this pastor had not before experienced in some twenty-five years of
ordained ministry. Our bishop taught. That is, he did not make
conference-related announcements. He did not offer administrative
musings. He did not share inspirational notes. Instead, Bp. Edwards
taught. He taught the faith of the Church catholic. Why did this
happen?
For months prior to
that October morning, there had been a low-grade rumble throughout The
United Methodist Church. The rumbling had been created by a
theological lecture delivered by Bishop Joseph C. Sprague, of United
Methodism’s Chicago Area. In his lecture at Iliff School of Theology,
Bp. Sprague had attempted to describe the Christian faith in
modernistic terms that would be understood and accepted by today’s
so-called “intellectuals.” Though evangelistically motivated, the
bishop’s lecture seemed to undermine Church doctrine related to Jesus
Christ. The virgin birth, the resurrection, and the nature of Jesus
Christ were explained to the point of being explained away. Again,
Bp. Sprague’s intentions were evangelistic and good; however, his
lecture seemed to erode the faith he intended to advance.
Posted on the
Internet, Bp. Sprague’s speech stirred some understandable
controversy. Finally, in the fall of 2002, Bishop Timothy W.
Whitaker, of the Florida Area, delivered a very careful rebuttal of
the lecture by the Chicago bishop. Then, on October 28th, at the
Bishop’s Day Apart in Raleigh, Bishop Edwards stood and delivered his
refutation of Bp. Sprague’s case.
It was an event to
remember. Our bishop, who is charged “[t]o guard, transmit, teach,
and proclaim, corporately and individually, the apostolic faith as it
is expressed in Scripture and tradition, and as . . . led and endowed
by the Spirit, to interpret that faith evangelically and
prophetically” (The Book of Discipline, 2000, Paragraph 414.3),
did exactly that. With a loving heart and with obvious personal
respect for Bp. Sprague, Bp. Edwards laid out his response to the
Chicago bishop’s earlier lecture. Persuasively and winsomely, our
bishop guarded, transmitted, taught, and proclaimed the faith of the
Church. And he did so with theological depth, precision, and
sophistication. This was not an over-heated, theological tirade by a
fundamentalist bully.
As Bp. Edwards began
to speak, the sanctuary fell eerily silent. The hundreds of assembled
North Carolina clergy listened intently. We knew in our hearts and
minds that something unusual, something memorable, even something
monumental, was happening. A friend, who is usually very critical of
such events, passed a note which read, “The bishop is at his absolute
best today. Thanks be to God.”
At the conclusion of
our bishop’s presentation, there was loud and long applause. At first
I was touched by disappointment that a standing ovation had not
followed. However, on second thought, that would have been
inappropriate. For appreciative applause by all, in response to a
powerful defense of the faith, kept the body unified. After all, this
was not a political rally. This was an occasion for a bishop to be
truly a bishop.
At the end of this
Bishop’s Day Apart, there was a certain joy in the air. In a very
loving and powerful way, our bishop, doing what he was consecrated and
is charged to do, had defended the faith. The air had been cleared of
some well-intended, but finally false, theological claims. All
present were reminded that Christians do not have to make a choice
between faith and reason, between faith and intelligence. And the
clergy had been unified by a strong confession of the Church’s faith.
This one presentation
by Bp. Edwards will not end the doctrinal problems within The United
Methodist Church. Continual teaching -- by our bishop, other bishops,
clergy, and laity -- will be necessary and helpful. But it is a
start. Perhaps even a breakthrough.
From
January 2003 St. Peter’s Post