WHAT IS THE POPULATION OF HELL?
Paul T. Stallsworth

Believe it or not, this question -- What is the population of hell? -- is now a vigorously debated question in the Roman Catholic Church. Some Catholic theologians, relying on Biblical teaching and Church tradition, are arguing that hell is very densely populated. Other Catholic thinkers, relying on different Biblical texts and different traditional sources, are contending that Christians should hope and pray that hell’s population is zero or very close to zero. And there are many who are taking positions between these two alternatives.

Recently, Avery Cardinal Dulles -- who is the most outstanding Roman Catholic theologian in the United States today and a theology professor at Fordham University -- courageously and thoughtfully responds to the question at hand in "The Population of Hell" (First Things, May 2003). After criticizing the kind of preaching that attempts to frighten people away from hell and into heaven, Cardinal Dulles concludes his article: "Today a kind of thoughtless optimism is the more prevalent error. Quite apart from what theologians teach, popular piety has become saccharine. Unable to grasp the rationale for eternal punishment, many Christians take it almost for granted that everyone, or practically everyone, must be saved. The Mass for the Dead [that is, the funeral service] has turned into a Mass of the Resurrection [that is, a service of life], which sometimes seems to celebrate not so much the resurrection of the Lord as the salvation of the deceased, without any reference to sin and punishment. More education is needed to convince people that they ought to fear God who, as Jesus taught, can punish soul and body together in hell (cf. Matthew 10:28).

"The search for numbers in the demography of hell is futile. God in His wisdom has seen fit not to disclose any statistics. Several sayings of Jesus in the Gospels give the impression that the majority are lost. Paul, without denying the likelihood that some sinners will die without sufficient repentance, teaches that the grace of Christ is more powerful than sin: ‘Where sin increased, grace abounded all the more’ (Romans 5:20). Passages such as these permit us to hope that very many, if not all, will be saved.

"All told, it is good that God has left us without exact information. If we knew that virtually everybody would be damned, we would be tempted to despair. If we knew that all, or nearly all, are saved, we might become presumptuous. If we knew that some fixed percent, say fifty, would be saved, we would be caught in an unholy rivalry. We would rejoice in every sign that others were among the lost, since our own chances of election would thereby be increased. Such a competitive spirit would hardly be compatible with the gospel.

"We are forbidden to seek our own salvation in a selfish and egotistical way. We are keepers of our brothers and sisters. The more we work for their salvation, the more of God’s favor we can expect for ourselves. Those of us who believe and make use of the means that God has provided for the forgiveness of sins and the reform of life have no reason to fear. We can be sure that Christ, who died on the Cross for us, will not fail to give us the grace we need. We know that in all things God works for the good of those who love Him, and that if we persevere in that love, nothing whatever can separate us from Christ (cf. Romans 8:28-39). That is all the assurance we can have, and it should be enough."

To which at least one United Methodist pastor in the Wesleyan tradition says: Amen!

From the June 2003 St. Peter's Post Newsletter Editorial