|
|
North Carolina
Christian Advocate, August
16, 2005
PUTTING POLITICS IN
ITS PLACE
by Rev. Paul T.
Stallsworth
The House of
Delegates, of the North Carolina Council of Churches (NCCC), met on May
10 at the Lutheran Church of the Epiphany in Winston-Salem. As usual,
Rev. George Reed, the Executive Director of the NCCC, excelled in making
sure that the entire meeting -- including the worship service, the
program, the luncheon, and the business session -- ran like clockwork.
The United Methodist delegates in attendance were made particularly
proud, during the luncheon, by the presentation of the NCCC’s
Distinguished Service Award to The Reverend Joe Mann, of the North
Carolina Conference and Duke Endowment. The award recognizes that Rev.
Mann’s ecumenical commitments run deep and wide.
The Reverend
Dr. James Dunn provided the sermon for the worship service and the
lecture for the morning program. With conviction seasoned by
experience, he preached and lectured (including a question-and-answer
period after the lecture). Dr. Dunn is currently the Professor of
Christianity and Public Policy at Wake Forest Divinity School in
Winston-Salem. For years, he had served as the Executive Director of
the Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs in Washington, DC.
Dr. Dunn’s
lecture was entitled “Two Things You Must Talk About: Politics and
Religion.” Not surprisingly, Dr. Dunn’s lecture followed the mandate of
its title: it addressed politics and religion in a most straightforward
way. In addition, his sermon, which preceded his lecture, willingly
engaged the politics of the day.
The lecture
and the sermon took sides in today’s arguments over politics, culture,
and religion, which are sometimes called the “culture wars” (James
Davison Hunter). Again and again, on issue after issue, they sided with
the progressives of our political sphere. They repeatedly mentioned the
“extremists on the Right.” They questioned the intelligence of
conservatives and Republicans, and spoke admiringly of Jim Wallis,
Norman Lear, and People for the American Way. They challenged the idea
of “faith-based initiatives.” The sermon asserted that the Religious
Right had made “God a public mascot,” and evaluated the claim of
“America’s Judeo-Christian heritage” as nothing but “political
balderdash.” And the lecture recalled a statement that conjectured,
politically speaking, the United States of 2005 is near Germany of 1933.
In general,
the sermon and the lecture argued that the Religious Right and the
Republicans are mistaken, misguided, and wrong in their politics and
religion. At the same time, the sermon and the lecture enthusiastically
approved the Religious Left and the Democrats. As stated earlier, these
presentations vigorously took sides in the “culture wars.”
(Three points
of interest might be mentioned here. First, very seldom, if ever, was
the word liberal used during these presentations. The word
progressive was preferred. One might wonder why. Second, the
sermon and the lecture advanced a set of political ideas that is most
actively promoted in American political life by those with a clearly
secularist agenda. So if the Religious Right has its fundamentalists,
the Religious Left is closely associated with secularists. And third,
during the program a political story was told. A politico, several
years ago, lamentably listed a large number of left-of-center United
States Senators who would soon be gone from the Senate. This comment
was then offered with sadness and alarming foreboding: “The moral center
of the United States Senate has changed...” But of course, one might
well reply. “The moral center of the United States Senate” is always
changing. In fact, it changes every two years, every time congressional
elections are held. Furthermore, the Church’s public moral teaching is,
or should be, much more stable and substantial and enduring than “the
moral center of the United States Senate.”)
A critical
review of Dr. Dunn’s sermon and lecture would raise a few questions for
extended response and even debate: Did this sermon and this lecture
place American politics above Christian theology? That is, did the
politics of these presentations determine their theology? And does the
placement of American politics above Christian theology make the visible
demonstration of Christian unity nearly impossible?
Some on the
Religious Right indeed appear to put their politics above their
religion. They are opposed by some on the Religious Left who do the
same thing: they place their political concerns above their theological
commitments. What then follows are red-hot battles between the
Religious Right and the Religious Left -- which include name calling,
questioning of character, insinuating of ignorance, and other
unpleasantries with which the American public is all too familiar.
The challenge
facing the North Carolina Council of Churches, the various
denominations, the many congregations, and Christians -- but especially
the NCCC, because of its ecumenical reason for being -- is to remember,
and to live by, the truth that politics is not the most important thing
in the world. The Kingdom of God, revealed especially in Jesus Christ,
is what is most important. When and only when that is recalled,
Christians can then engage in serious, respectful political discussion,
even debate, that just might set an example in political discourse that
could benefit the larger society.
But the first
step is to put politics in its place. If that is not done, Christian
disunity and political warfare will be sure to continue.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rev. Stallsworth is
the pastor of St. Peter’s United Methodist Church in Morehead City, NC.
To respond to this article and continue the dialogue, please send your
article to: St. Peter’s United Methodist Church/111 Hodges
Street/Morehead City, NC 28557.
|